How to Brief a Case for Law School

How to Brief a Case for Law School

A step-by-step guide by a #1 law student

Here, we discuss how to brief a case for law school. However, before we get into those, it is necessary to lay the groundwork and a few principles.

1. First, you don’t have to brief every case to do well in law school!

Briefing cases is a great way to critically read the facts, closely read the cases, and prepare for class discussion.

However, you do not have to handwrite a brief for every case you are assigned in order to do well. It is more important to incorporate case preparation into an overall study strategy like this.

However, briefing cases is not a bad skill to have . . . 

Briefing cases can be helpful. Briefing cases helps you become detail-oriented and it is helpful for dissecting somewhat complicated fact patterns. It helps you to remain focused when you read. Perhaps it makes you less nervous if you’re called on. Briefing cases also helps you get comfortable with legal language if you regularly put the facts and law into your own words when writing your case briefs. Briefing cases can help you truly dissect and understand the case. It can help you extract key legal rules. And think like a lawyer.

So you may want to brief cases:

• as you are getting used to law school
• if you know you’ll be called on in class, or
• if you are reading a super important case.

I found that dissecting the actual language of the case was more important. So I recommend, in general, to stick to book briefing, which is a form of case-briefing (which does not involve rewriting full case briefs) which we will discuss below.

2. Second, case briefs should be brief.

A lot of students who choose to brief cases end up practically writing the whole case over again. This is oftentimes because they:

• Copy and paste directly from the case (This is not recommended! Unless it is a rule statement, use your own words!)
• Brief a case the first time they read it so they don’t know what is important and what is not important. (To write an effective case brief, you should read the case once through prior to briefing it.)

That brings us to the third principle.

3. Case briefs should be personal.

Case briefs should be written in your own words. They should be written after you have personally spent a lot of time reviewing the case (so you should read the case at least once through before starting on your case brief). 

A Case Brief Template:

Before we dive into a step-by-step guide to briefing cases, let’s look at a case brief template. This template tells you the general parts of a case brief.

A Step-by-Step Guide to Briefing Cases

Step One: Figure Out the Basics

These “basics” don’t have much bearing on the substances of the case (the exception is that the procedural history may matter in a Civil Procedure class).

Rather, these basics are just the basic tools that will help you identify what the case is called, who the parties are, and where, in the court system, the case is.

Name of case:

Start by saying the name of the case at the top of your case brief—for example, Smith v. Jones. 

Parties:

Identify the parties. Who is the plaintiff? The defendant? Once you identify who’s who, you might want to abbreviate the parties as “P” and “D” to make it easier and quicker to write your brief.

Procedure:

Identify the procedural posture of the case. Are we at the trial or appellate level? State or federal court? At which stage in the litigation was the case when the issue arose?

Step Two: Identify the issue:  

Identify the legal issue that the opinion is addressing. Often, the cases assigned in a casebook are shorter excerpts of a much longer opinion, so the issue will be apparent.

A trick to figure out the issue: Look at where in the casebook the issue is presented (e.g., if it is being presented under “breach of duty”, then the issue probably has to do with breach of duty)

Step Three: Summarize the relevant facts.

The keyword here is relevant. Case opinions will typically include a detailed story about what happened. Your goal is to distill it down into the most relevant facts. For example, if a Torts case focuses on whether the defendant had the intent to commit a battery, facts such as the medical expenses incurred would not be relevant. But facts about the plaintiff and the defendant’s relationship (that may indicate the presence of intent, or lack thereof, may be relevant).

So don’t write all the facts down! Instead, write down the legally significant facts.

Step Four: State the Rule

The next step is to state the rule that the court applied. Remember to not summarize the rule. Instead, you will likely want to copy it exactly as the court states it. (Every word can make a difference in how the law may be applied!)

Note that a court might be applying a well-established rule or it may be fashioning its own rule.

Step Five: Complete the analysis

Analysis/Application:

Next, describe the court’s reasoning. Which facts did the court apply the rule of law to? (These facts should also be in your factual summary, above!)

If the court developed a new rule of law after viewing a case of first impression, then why did it choose to do so? Did it rely on specific facts? Public policy? A court opinion from a higher court?

Step Six: Quickly state the holding and the judgment of the court.

Holding

This is the court’s legal conclusion.  For example, did the court hold that the defendant was liable for negligence? The holding is basically the outcome of the case. It is what happens when the court applies the rule of law to the facts.

Judgment

This is the ultimate disposition of the case. Did the court grant or deny a motion? Affirm or reverse a lower court? The judgment can usually be just a few words at the end of your case brief.

Note that some case briefs combine the judgment with the holding under the “holding” section of the case brief.

Step Seven: If there is a dissenting or concurring opinion, it may be worth it to jot a few notes on it. 

Dissent/concurring opinion

Not every case has a dissenting opinion or concurring opinion, but if your casebook includes one, it’s not an accident. Oftentimes, a dissent can be just as important as a majority opinion, especially if it highlights a major disagreement in the law or points out significant gaps in the majority’s reasoning.  Further, there’s a good chance that your professor will want to discuss it.  In short, jotting down one or two sentences about the dissent or concurring opinion can be valuable in preparing you for class discussion.

How to Book Brief a Case in Law School 

We recommend book briefing. Book briefing is essentially a heavy annotation of a case in the casebook—i.e., you identify the key portions of the case, and you add notes in the margins to aid you during class and in your studying.

For example:

• Write “FACTS” next to the facts in your casebook (or highlight the facts in whatever color you have designated for facts!).
• Write “RULE” next to the rule in your casebook.
• Note the procedural history, holding, rationale, and other key points in your casebook either by writing these words or color-coding your casebook, as noted above.

An example is below:

The nice thing about book briefing is you still closely read the case, you just don’t spend valuable time rewriting large portions of the case. And, you can look at your casebook if you are called on in class and you have everything you need—your notes, as well as the case—in one place.

Every student learns at their own pace and uses case-briefing and book-briefing differently in their overall study plan.

We hope this gives you some guidance as you begin to brief cases in law school! Good luck!

• Seeking Success in Law School?

  • Benefit from personalized one-on-one tutoring by our seasoned law school tutors.
  • Explore our NEW and highly acclaimed law school study aids, available for a free trial.